Man Sues Police After Being Arrested While Meditating — But Did He Confess?
A seemingly peaceful moment in a public park took a dramatic turn for Mr. Red Vine, who claims he was wrongfully arrested while meditating on a bench — and is now fighting back in court.
The case unfolded in a courtroom where Red Vine, the plaintiff, demanded $25,000 in punitive damages from Officer Ortega for what he calls “pain and suffering.” Along with that, Red Vine is pushing to have all charges against him dropped.
What Happened That Day?
According to Red Vine, he was simply minding his own business, meditating on a park bench, when Officer Ortega approached him without explanation. “I don’t want to give him no answers ‘cause I’m doing me,” Red Vine said in his testimony. He described feeling startled and threatened when the officer started asking questions and accused him of suspicious behavior without stating any reason.
Red Vine insists he was never told what crime he was accused of and that he received no paperwork or formal charges when arrested. “I don’t know what I’m here for,” he testified.
Officer Ortega’s Side of the Story
Officer Ortega described the situation quite differently. He said police received a call reporting suspicious activity in the park, where a recent robbery and kidnapping had taken place. According to Ortega, Red Vine matched the description of the suspect. “I saw this man sitting there with his eyes closed. I don’t know what he’s doing,” Ortega testified.
The officer claimed that at the precinct, in an interview room, Red Vine confessed to involvement in the kidnapping — a confession Ortega said contradicted Red Vine’s courtroom testimony.
However, Ortega admitted the interview was conducted alone, without any other officers present, raising questions about the validity of the confession.
A Clash of Stories: Confession or Coercion?
The heart of this case lies in a conflicting narrative: Red Vine’s insistence that he was wrongfully arrested without cause or explanation, versus Ortega’s claim that the arrest was justified based on witness reports and a confession.
Red Vine’s attorneys argue that the arrest was based on racial profiling and that the officer’s behavior caused unnecessary pain and suffering. Ortega, meanwhile, maintains he was simply doing his job — acting on a credible tip and evidence.
What’s Next?
The judge now faces a difficult decision: Was Red Vine a victim of mistaken identity and police overreach, or did Officer Ortega correctly identify and detain a dangerous suspect?
This case highlights ongoing tensions around law enforcement practices, racial profiling, and the rights of citizens during police encounters — a topic that resonates deeply across the country.
As the courtroom drama continues, the public watches closely, wondering if justice will be served for a man who says all he wanted was to meditate in peace.
About the Author
